Antibiotics Removal in Biological Sewage Treatment Plants

Authors

  • Gopal Ghosh 1. Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan; 2. Departments of Environmental Science and Technology, Jessore University of Science and Technology, Jessore 7408, Bangladesh
  • H. Tanaka Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • N. Yamashita Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • S. Hanamoto Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Kyoto 615–8540, Japan
  • X. Huang Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:

This study investigated the occurrence and removal of 12 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) at four sewage treatment plants (STPs): two STPs in Kyoto, Japan and two STPs in Beijing, China. The STPs differed in design and operation conditions, utilized a variety of secondary treatment processes. The antibiotics were frequently detected in influents and effluents, and ranged from ng/L up to lower μg/L. In influent, clarithromycin (1.1–1.6 μg/L) and levofloxacin (3.6–6.8 μg/L) were detected in the highest concentration in Japanese and Chinese STPs, respectively. The overall elimination of the antibiotics were differed between STPs and ranged from negative to >90%. These data demonstrate that there are detectable levels of antibiotics are discharging from STPs, and only some of these antibiotics are being removed in a significant proportion by STPs. It was also observed that biological nutrient removal based sewage treatment processes (anaerobic–anoxic–oxic: A2O; and anoxic–oxic: AO) have relatively higher antibiotics removal efficiencies than oxidation ditch (OD) processes.

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

antibiotics removal in biological sewage treatment plants

this study investigated the occurrence and removal of 12 antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, lincomycin, novobiocin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim) at four sewage treatment plants (stps): two stps in kyoto, japan and two stps in beijing, china. the stps differed in design and operation conditions, uti...

full text

Removal of antibiotics from wastewater by sewage treatment facilities in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China.

Concentrations of nine antibiotics [erythromycin-H(2)O (ERY-H(2)O); trimethoprim (TMP); tetracycline (TET); norfloxacin (NOR); penicillin G (PEN G); penicillin V (PEN V); cefalexin (CLX); cefotaxim (CTX); and cefazolin (CFZ)] were measured in influent and effluent samples from four sewage treatment plants (STPs) in Hong Kong as well as in influent samples from one STP in Shenzhen. Levels of PEN...

full text

Occurrence of antibiotics in eight sewage treatment plants in Beijing, China.

The occurrence, removal efficiency and seasonal variation of 22 antibiotics, including eight fluoroquinolones, nine sulfonamides and five macrolides, were investigated in eight sewage treatment plants (STPs) in Beijing, China. A total of 14 antibiotics were detected in wastewater samples, with the maximum concentration being 3.1 μg L(-1) in the influent samples and 1.2 μg L(-1) in the effluent ...

full text

Life Cycle Assessment of Biological Nutrient Removal Wastewater Treatment Plants

Advances in wastewater treatment over the past 150 years have improved public health and local water quality. Recently however, society has begun to consider the wider environmental implications of these improvements. This paper uses life cycle assessment to quantitatively compare the environmental costs and benefits of different wastewater treatment technologies and standards. It is demonstrat...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 2  issue 2

pages  131- 139

publication date 2016-04-01

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023